Please tell me this is fake news...

Revvv

Revvv

Infinity Poster
Established Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2017
Messages
10,189
Location
GA
I don't think that pic meets any frontal crash regulations, but it would work great to keep an engine and supercharger (or turbos) cool.

Sent from my SM-G930V using the svtperformance.com mobile app
 
08mojo

08mojo

...
Established Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2012
Messages
2,681
Location
Atlanta, GA
Looks like the front end from the GAS abomination

2016-ford-mustang-rocket--6.jpg
 
C

C0bra99

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
897
Location
Canada
If you look at the official Ford released picture the snake looks higher then the snake in the blue rendering. You know why? I know one person doesn't.... it's for the crash bumper....
bc62a882e8f92179fe7aeff4149898bf.jpg


Sent from my SM-N950W using Tapatalk
 
Gr8fulmtnbiker

Gr8fulmtnbiker

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
823
Location
Southeastern PA
GT Premi said:
Hmm... Having owned a MOPAR product, I want to see if you still think it's worth it after just two or three years when trivial and not so trivial stuff starts failing. A couple years ago, I said I was gonna buy a Trackhawk, but that was when I was guessing the price would be around $80K. For $100K? No way. I'd rather spend that on a used Cayenne Turbo or GLE 63. Yeah, it'll be slower, but it'll also have a lot more tangibles than the Trackhawk. Depreciation will fall off a cliff at about the same rate, too.
Click to expand...

I don’t know which you had but I suppose only time will tell then for me won’t it negative nelly??? Too bad your experience sucked. Hopefully mine won’t. My cousin has had a juiced up and modded srt Durango for several years and not a single issue with anything. My neighbors cousin has had a flawless Trackhawk since day 1. I have several examples but I am sure there are those like yours as well. Til then I’m gonna enjoy the hell out of it. Luckily I move in and out of vehicles pretty quickly so it likely will never matter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Tob

Tob

Salut!
Super Moderator
Joined
Mar 17, 2009
Messages
12,228
Location
The Ville
Genuine Ford cad renderings are actually more accurate than a photograph unless intentionally altered to hide or disguise something. You won't see bumper sag or varying panel gaps in a digitized drawing created on a computer at the headquarters of the mother ship.
 
Klay

Klay

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
1,504
Location
California
DepWraith said:
Okay, laugh at me because you don't know the difference between a rendering and a photo...like I will lose sleep over it?

Of course not ONE of you has been able to provide an actual photograph released by Ford, despite your instance that I'm wrong and you're right.

So easy to prove me wrong by posting an actual photograph, yet you haven't.

Other people are reading this as well, but not commenting for fear of being the target of your immature jokes, but rest assured they realize that you're still wrong...don't fool yourselves.
Click to expand...

I'm failing to see what you are actually arguing other then semantics. Who cares if it is a render or photograph? The point was the render in the magazine is different then what ford released. People didnt like the look of the grill in the magazine. What was released before looks better.

That was the point Tob made, nothing more and nothing less. Unless You are somehow trying to argue that the render ford released is not accurate, then your argument is moot.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)


Top